home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1992
-
-
-
- APPEAL -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 91-1514 ANNE ARUNDEL CTY., ET AL. V. ST. ADMIN. BD., ET AL.
-
- The judgment is affirmed. Justice Stevens would
-
- note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral
-
- argument.
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- D-1084 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JEFFREY LEE GREENSPAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Jeffrey
-
- Lee Greenspan, of Rockville, Maryland, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Court of
-
- Appeals of Maryland and this Court by order of February
-
- 24, 1992, having suspended the said Jeffrey Lee
-
- Greenspan from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause
-
- why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Jeffrey Lee Greenspan
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
- D-1085 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DONALD J. KENNEY
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Donald J.
-
- Kenney, of Safford, Arizona, has been disbarred from the
-
- practice of law by the Supreme Court of Arizona and this
-
- Court by order of March 2, 1992, having suspended the
-
- said Donald J. Kenney from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Donald J. Kenney be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1090 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GERALD J. GARNER
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Gerald J.
-
- Garner, of Harrison, New York, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, and this
-
- Court by order of March 2, 1992, having suspended the
-
- said Gerald J. Garner from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Gerald J. Garner be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1091 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GRANVILLE H. CRABTREE, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Granville
-
- H. Crabtree, Jr., of Sarasota, Florida, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Florida and this Court by order of March 9, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Granville H. Crabtree, Jr.,
-
- from the practice of law in this Court and directed that
-
- a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Granville H. Crabtree,
-
- Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1092 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN JOHN DEVINE
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Stephen
-
- John Devine, of Norristown, Pennsylvania, has been
-
- suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, and this Court by
-
- order of March 9, 1992, having suspended the said
-
- Stephen John Devine from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Stephen John Devine be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1093 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALAN E. ROBBINS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Alan E.
-
- Robbins, of Van Nuys, California, has resigned from the
-
- practice of law before the Supreme Court of California
-
- and this Court by order of March 9, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Alan E. Robbins from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Alan E. Robbins be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1095 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ADRIAN F. O'BRYAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Adrian F.
-
- O'Bryan, of Louisville, Kentucky, has resigned from the
-
- practice of law before the Supreme Court of Kentucky and
-
- this Court by order of March 23, 1992, having suspended
-
- the said Adrian F. O'Bryan from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him
-
- to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Adrian F. O'Bryan be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1126 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN T. MARTIN
-
- It is ordered that John T. Martin, of Springfield,
-
- Missouri, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1127 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM DALTON WHITNALL
-
- It is ordered that William Dalton Whitnall, of
-
- Ripon, Wisconsin, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1128 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CARLOS ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ
-
- It is ordered that Carlos Alberto Rodriguez, of
-
- Miami, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 111 ORIG. DELAWARE V. NEW YORK
-
- The fee application dated March 27, 1992 submitted
-
- by the Special Master in this action is approved, and
-
- payment shall be made to "Thomas H. Jackson, Special
-
- Master" in the total amount of $105,824.85. It is
-
- further ordered that the participating jurisdictions
-
- shall bear these costs equally , with each jurisdiction
-
- which is a party or which has a pending application to
-
- intervene at the date of this order contributing an
-
- an equal share. It is further ordered that each such
-
- jurisdiction may make payment either to the firm of
-
- Dickstein, Shapiro & Morin, as coordinating counsel
-
- for this purpose, or may make payment directly or via
-
- separate counsel, to the Special Master. It is further
-
- ordered that payment of fees, costs, and expenses
-
- pursuant to this order shall be due within forty-five
-
- (45) days from the date hereof.
-
- 91-32 SORBOTHANE, INC., ET AL. V. McQUILLAN, SHIRLEY, ET AL.
-
- The motion of respondents to expedite consideration
-
- of the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Blackmun would grant this motion.
-
- 91-1270 RICHARDS, GOV. OF TEXAS V. TERRAZAS, LOUIS, ET AL.
-
- The motion of potential intervenors, Guadalupe Mena,
-
- et al., for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
-
- granted. The motion of Guadalupe Mena, et al., for leave
-
- to intervene is denied.
-
- 91-7497 RUSSELL, HERBERT P. V. FRANK, POSTMASTER GENERAL
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until
-
- June 16, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
- 91-1229 UNITED STATES, ETC. V. McDERMOTT, BRUCE J., ET AL.
-
- 91-1300 UNITED STATES V. DUNNIGAN, SHARON
-
- 91-1594 EDENFIELD, FRED, ET AL. V. FANE, SCOTT
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
-
- 91-904 CONCRETE PIPE AND PRODUCTS V. CONST. LABORERS PENSION
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted
-
- limited to Questions 2 and 4 presented by the petition.
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 91-1233 ZARZECKI, CHARLES M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1376 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY V. USDC CD CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-1399 UTE DISTRIBUTION CORP. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1404 AMEJI, BASHIRAHMED M. V. COWAN, ATTY. GEN., KENTUCKY
-
- 91-1422 HOBBS, S. PAUL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1544 KRASNIQI, SADRI V. DALLAS CTY. CHILD SERV.
-
- 91-1575 THOMPSON, RICHARD V. KRAMER, STEVEN M.
-
- 91-1576 LEVENE, LESTER, ET AL. V. PINTAIL ENTERPRISES, ET AL.
-
- 91-1578 TOMCZYK, JANE V. BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD
-
- 91-1580 TOWER, OSGOOD V. NORTHERN VA TRANS., ET AL.
-
- 91-1583 KINSEY, NOLAN V. SALADO SCHOOL DISTRICT
-
- 91-1584 RIMELL, HARRIET, ET VIR V. MARK TWAIN BANK, ET AL.
-
- 91-1585 THOMPSON, PATRICIA, ET VIR V. PEOPLES LIBERTY BANK, ET AL.
-
- 91-1591 OSEI-AFRIYIE, FRANCIS V. MED. COLL. OF PENNSYLVANIA
-
- 91-1605 CONTRERAS, JUAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1606 ZURAK, GUSTAVE V. NEW YORK
-
- 91-1614 INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS V. COTTON BROS. BAKING CO., INC
-
- 91-1622 GREGORY, RONALD W., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 91-1627 MITCHELL, HENRY, ET UX. V. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS.
-
- 91-1635 RENZ, RONALD V. EAGLE ASSOC., ET AL.
-
- 91-1660 BRENNEN, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1664 DYKES, MARCIA V. NO. VA TRANS. DIST. COMMN.
-
- 91-1684 WILLIAMS, BERESFORD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1713 ZUMBO, JOSEPH, V. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6462 VAN HORN, DANNY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6627 MALANDRINI, CAROLE M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6876 EDWARDS, DANIEL J. V. ILLINOIS
-
- 91-6943 MILLSAPS, STEVE E. V. MASTERS, GREG, ET AL.
-
- 91-7129 RODRIGUEZ, GUSTAVO P. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7448 CARTER, ANDREW V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7462 SALGADO-ARISTIZABEL, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7463 UBRI, STEPHEN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7469 AGU, PATRICK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7516 ORTIZ-MORILLO, LUIS F. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7654 ) RICH, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 91-7907 ) HOOPER, MELANIE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7792 CORONEL, PAUL K. V. COMMR., PATENT & TRADEMARK
-
- 91-7803 BARBER, BYRON V. VOSE, DIR., RHODE ISLAND DOC
-
- 91-7805 TAYLOR, FLOSSIE V. SULLIVAN, SEC. OF H&HS
-
- 91-7807 HOWARD, NORMAN V. RILEY, SUPT.
-
- 91-7808 ISENBERG, LEWIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7810 BOYE, RICHARD L. V. VIRGINIA
-
- 91-7811 WEST, JOHN V. FLORIDA
-
- 91-7813 BOLDEN, RUSSELL V. SE PENNSYLVANIA TRANS. AUTH.
-
- 91-7822 KELLEY, CLINT, ET AL. V. FRYE, JOHN P.
-
- 91-7823 SINDRAM, MICHAEL V. ROTH, CLAIRE
-
- 91-7827 CARPENTER, LORENZO V. LOUISIANA
-
- 91-7829 BRADFORD, JOHNNY O. V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
-
- 91-7830 GOOCH, DENISE S. V. VIGORITA, JOHN F.
-
- 91-7840 FARMER, BERNIE L. V. GROOSE, MICHAEL, ET AL.
-
- 91-7841 BLANCO, OMAR V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FLORIDA DOC
-
- 91-7856 DANIELSON, FREDERICK L. V. ROSZKOWSKI, STANLEY J.
-
- 91-7860 McCOY, HENRY L. V. NEWSOME, WARDEN
-
- 91-7862 CASWELL, WILLIAM V. RYAN, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- 91-7868 SINDRAM, MICHAEL V. SAXTON, SAMUEL, ET AL.
-
- 91-7870 McLAURIN, GLORIA V. NORTHLAND SECURITY POLICE
-
- 91-7871 McLAURIN, PATRICE D. V. NORTHLAND SECURITY POLICE
-
- 91-7875 HULL, FLOYD J. V. PARKER, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7878 HAMPSON, CELIA M. V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL.
-
- 91-7955 BOONE, ERNEST D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7965 CASEY, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7966 ATKINS, DONALD V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
-
- 91-7967 BROWN, LAMONT A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7986 COLLINS, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7987 UPSHAW, KENNY R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7989 WICKSTROM, JAMES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7996 BAILEY, ANDRE L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8004 PRECIADO-LEON, CONNIE D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8012 DAVIS, DON C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8015 WRICE, GREGORY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8026 BECAK, HOWARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8030 LUETH, AMEL F. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8033 HELMY, ABDELKADER V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8035 CRUMITY, LAMONT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8039 HOLMES, EDWARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8044 DANIELS, ODOLPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8047 RODRIGUEZ, RAUL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8055 ARMENDARIZ-MATA, CARLOS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8057 MORENO, MARGARITO M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8061 CHRISTENSON, TIMOTHY L. V. MICHIGAN
-
- 91-8063 CHUKWUBIKE, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8065 GOMEZ, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8066 KURASHIGE, IRIS T. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8068 CONEY, WALDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8069 NUNEZ, RENE T. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8089 VASQUEZ, WILLIAM V. HENDERSON, WARDEN
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- 91-1382 SCHUBERT ORGANIZATION V. LANDMARKS PRESERVATION
-
- The motion of Real Estate Board of New York, Inc.
-
- for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.
-
- The motion of Pacific Legal Foundation for leave to file
-
- a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a
-
- writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 91-1417 SINGLETARY, SEC., FLORIDA DOC V. BLANCO, OMAR
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
- 91-1595 GLASSER, JAY V. A. H. ROBINS CO., ET AL.
-
- The motion of Dalkon Shield Alliance for Justice
-
- for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 91-1597 PENNSYLVANIA V. CHAMBERS, KARL
-
- The motion of Institute in Basic Life Principles
-
- for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 91-7470 WILSON, LARRY V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice White would grant certiorari.
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
- 91-1145 CAMPBELL, RON V. DONDERO, THALIA, ET AL.
-
- 91-1453 HOANG, LIEU B. V. SIMS, STEPHEN M., ET AL.
-
- 91-5707 GAGE, KENNETH E. V. GORG, WARDEN
-
- 91-6446 BANKS, ALFRED V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-6682 JEFFRESS, JESSE W. V. JEFFRESS, GLENDA J.
-
- 91-6886 ABATE, TESHOME V. HUD, ET AL.
-
- 91-6927 REID, KEVIN J. V. CITY OF FLINT
-
- 91-6944 NABKEY, L. LEA V. PECKERAL, STEVE, ET AL.
-
- 91-7175 ROSS, JEROME V. DAKOTA RAIL, INC., ET AL.
-
- 91-7186 JONES, WILLIE L. V. MURRAY, DIR., VIRGINIA DOC
-
- 91-7211 CORDLE, ARZELLA A. V. SQUARE D CO.
-
- 91-7283 YOUNG, LARRY, J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7294 GAMBLE, OREN G. V. WEBSTER, ATTY. GEN., MISSOURI
-
- 91-7455 SOLIS, ARTURO V. TEXAS
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
- 91-6122 WHITAKER, RONALD V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion for leave to file a petition for
-
- rehearing is denied.
-
-
-
- RECESS ORDER
-
- The Court will take a recess from Tuesday,
-
- May 26, 1992 until Monday, June 1, 1992.
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-